His stories do now not make him sour; as a substitute, it builds in his empathy for similarly positioned sufferers Lawyers are supposed to be emotionally detached from their instances. “Don’t identify together with your clients”- that is the chant for ensuring professional performance, and extra importantly, one’s mental peace. But now not all can function with such smartly divided booths of expert commitments and private values. Shahid Azmi, the Mumbai-based legal professional who changed into shot dead in 2010 for coping with instances of terror accused Muslims, belonged to the latter class. This is the influence conveyed by using the countrywide award prevailing biopic “Shahid,” launched in 2013.
At one scene within the movie, Shahid( Raj Kumar Rao) is seen disobeying the commands of his senior, a leading criminal attorney, to handle the case of a consumer. Because, Shahid is convinced that it changed into an “open and close case of crime,” which need to no longer be defended. His senior dubs him naive and asks him to analyze the approaches of the profession to make a residing out of it.
Later we see Shahid beginning his practice, handling cases of those from a particular spectrum- harmless people detained under draconian anti-terror legal guidelines, who he believes to have been targeted completely on the idea of their religious identification. He is emotionally invested in those cases. In the court scenes, we do not see him sober, clinical or even sleek. Rather, he is impassioned, stressed, intense and pushed through internal rage in opposition to the unjustness of the machine. So a great deal so that a judge once tells him that he must “learn to let go occasionally.” Even after the listening to is adjourned, we see him persevering with the argument with the prosecutor who had adversarial his bail plea. He is impatient and uneasy until he sees injustice rectified because of the concept of himself as preventing a cause than the instances of few individuals. There is a purpose why Shahid’s method turned into shape for that reason.
He was a sufferer of systemic oppression. The starting of the movie offers a peek into the early years of his maturity. Deeply disturbed after witnessing the horrors of the 1992 Bombay riots, he was led off beam to join a jihadi training camp. Later, properly sense dawns on him, and he escapes the camp. But the folly of adolescence comes returned to hang-out him a lot later, while he gets implicated under TADA for a case in which he had no involvement at all. In prison, meets the radical Omar Sheikh, who become later released by using India after hijack of Indian Airlines flight in 1999. Sheikh attempts to inject the idea in Shahid that Muslims will now not get justice in India. Shahid additionally meets Ghulam Navi Waar, a ‘reformed radical,’ who offers him sanguine recommend that “to alternate the machine, you need to part of the gadget.” Presented with two absolutely one-of-a-kind paths, he opts to discard the unconventional recommendation, defying the determinist theory that a person’s moves are predetermined by way of occasions. One continually keeps the power to shape the future. Free will triumphs no matter the circumstances! Later, Shahid receives acquitted with the aid of the Supreme Court of all terrorism fees, after nearly eight years of detention without trial.
“Indian judiciary is sluggish; however it works,” he sighs. His experiences do now not make him bitter; as a substitute, it constructs in his empathy for also placed sufferers. With the decision to combat injustice he chooses to examine regulation. His pursuit of justice is guided using the subsequent motto of Roy Black: “By showing me injustice, he taught me to like justice. By coaching me what ache and humiliation had been all about, he woke up my heart to mercy. Through those hardships, I discovered the difficult training. Fight against prejudice, war the oppressors, support the underdog. Question authority, shake up the machine, never be discouraged by way of difficult times and difficult humans.
Embrace folks that are located finally., to whom even the lowest looks as if up. It took me some time to locate my assignment in existence – that of a crook protection lawyer. But that ‘faculty,’ and that Teacher, placed me on my real course. I will never be discouraged. Even thorns and thistles can train you something, and lead to achievement” By the time he begins to practice, TADA gets repealed, however simplest to get replaced via a similarly draconian POTA. The victims continue to be identical. “My consumer could now not had been detained if his name became Michael, John or More”, he argues in courtroom in the case of Zaheer Sheikh, who become arrested on the only floor of lending a computer to a childhood pal, who grew to become out to be the terrorist bomber in Ghatkopar case.
He punctures the concoctions of prosecution with common-sense. When a planted witness tells the court that he noticed the accused within the employer of terrorists in Nepal, Shahid asks “Tell me, what is the foreign money of Nepal?”. The witness receives without difficulty discredited. When prosecution says that the accused had surpassed over a map to the terrorist in 26/eleven attacks, Shahid points out that the map claimed to had been recovered from the trousers of the slain terrorist had no blood stains and become smartly creased.
When driven to the wall, the prosecutor retorts nastily, taunting Shahid with his past. This unsettles him, making him ask in Court “Am I the only on trial?”. Rajkumar Rao’s diminutive body and boyish charms lend a fitting ordinariness to Shahid, who went approximately his existence with none notions of heroic self-image. Director Hansal Mehta follows a restricted approach, with the economic system of shots, condensing Shahid’s life in much less than a hundred and twenty mins.
The film is about in a somber tone, which befits Shahid’s latent angst. The grim political subtext of the movie is conveyed powerfully, with nuance and discretion. The courtroom scenes are nicely choreographed, even though the romantic tune and extended family scenes regarded contrived. In his quick seven years of practice, Shahid secured 17 acquittals, which blanketed those accused inside the sensational Ghatkopar blast case, July 2006 local teach blasts case, and 26/11 terror attack. Enemies poked a laugh at him with the moniker “jihadi on ka Gandhi.” The media termed him “reformed radical,” though he was never an intensive at any factor of his life, and was acquitted of all terrorism fees. On February eleven, 2010 he was shot lifeless in his office. He changed into managing the case of Faheem Khan, an accused in 26/11 attack case then. Faheem Khan became later acquitted by Court, after Shahid’s demise.